csharp

Plan and execute C#/.NET project changes with static validation.

45|12|Updated Mar 1, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/LdotJdot/OpenLum --skill csharp-ldotjdot
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: csharp
Source: https://github.com/LdotJdot/OpenLum/tree/main/OpenLum.Console/Skills/csharp
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/LdotJdot/OpenLum --skill csharp-ldotjdot

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

C#/.NET project work often suffers from scattered approaches to planning, architecture, and debugging. This Skill provides structured guidance that emphasizes upfront planning, code navigation, and safe validation by prioritizing dotnet CLI workflows and static analysis, while explicitly prohibiting runtime runs.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Plan and structure C# projects across solution boundaries, library boundaries, and test suites.
  • Use Grep/SemanticSearch and sub-agents to locate relevant code areas, propose refactor steps, and gather information from project files, documents, and internet sources.
  • Debug and validate changes through static checks and compilation, ensuring build success as the completion criterion.

Quick Start

Provide a C# project or problem description, and I will analyze requirements, outline an architecture, propose changes, and validate them via dotnet build.

Frequently Asked Questions about csharp

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I plan and refactor a C# .NET project across multiple solution boundaries?

To plan and refactor a C# .NET project, use structured guidance that analyzes requirements, navigates code with Grep, applies patch-based changes, and validates via dotnet build. This ensures safe architecture modifications across library boundaries and test suites.

What is the best way to debug C# code without executing the application?

The best way to debug C# without runtime execution is through static analysis and compilation checks. By enforcing build-based completion and prohibiting runtime runs, you validate changes non-destructively by ensuring dotnet build succeeds.

Can I use dotnet CLI workflows to apply patch-based changes to my codebase?

Yes, you can use dotnet CLI workflows to apply patch-based changes. The process locates relevant code areas using SemanticSearch, proposes modifications, and validates them through static checks and compilation to ensure build success.

Does static analysis work for validating C# refactoring steps in large codebases?

Static analysis works effectively for validating C# refactoring steps by checking code navigation and compilation success. It replaces runtime runs with dotnet build validation, ensuring changes are safe and non-destructive across multiple projects.

Why should I prohibit runtime runs when debugging and refactoring C# projects?

You should prohibit runtime runs during C# refactoring to ensure non-destructive validation. Relying on static analysis and dotnet build completion prevents unintended side effects from code execution while confirming structural integrity.

What are the limitations of using static checks for C# code navigation and debugging?

The limitation of static checks for C# debugging is the explicit prohibition of runtime execution. Validation depends entirely on dotnet build success and static analysis, meaning logical runtime errors or dynamic behavior cannot be verified.