csharp-solid-pragmatic

Review C# designs against SOLID principles and suggest minimal refactors.

Updated Apr 21, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/snailb1007/snail-codex-skills --skill csharp-solid-pragmatic
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: csharp-solid-pragmatic
Source: https://github.com/snailb1007/snail-codex-skills/tree/main/skills/csharp-solid-pragmatic
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/snailb1007/snail-codex-skills --skill csharp-solid-pragmatic

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Pragmatic C# SOLID review and implementation guidance targeted at improving maintainability, testability, and boundary clarity without unnecessary abstractions.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Design reviews focused on SOLID, DI, and clean architecture to assess class hierarchies, services, controllers, and domain workflows.
  • Boundary guidance and dependency management to minimize coupling and improve testability across ASP.NET Core apps, background jobs, and repositories.
  • Refactor guidance and actionable steps to extract responsibilities, reduce cross-cutting concerns, and align with cohesive feature boundaries.

Quick Start

Provide a concise SOLID-focused review of a given C# design and suggest the smallest viable refactor to improve maintainability.

Frequently Asked Questions about csharp-solid-pragmatic

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I review C# SOLID design principles in my service layer?

To review C# SOLID design, evaluate class hierarchies and service layers for SRP, OCP, LSP, ISP, and DIP compliance. This process assesses maintainability, testability, and boundary definitions to provide the smallest viable refactor steps.

What is pragmatic SOLID design for C# controllers and repositories?

Pragmatic SOLID design for C# controllers and repositories applies dependency inversion and minimal abstractions to improve maintainability without unnecessary coupling. It focuses on clean-architecture boundaries and cohesive feature separation.

How do I refactor C# code to improve testability and reduce coupling?

Refactor C# code to improve testability by extracting responsibilities, reducing cross-cutting concerns, and aligning with cohesive feature boundaries. Apply DI best practices and minimal abstractions to minimize coupling across ASP.NET Core apps and background jobs.

Does this SOLID review approach work with ASP.NET Core background jobs?

Yes, this SOLID review approach works with ASP.NET Core background jobs. It provides boundary guidance and dependency management to minimize coupling and improve testability specifically across controllers, repositories, and domain workflows.

When should I not use minimal abstractions in C# clean architecture?

You should reconsider minimal abstractions in C# clean architecture when they fail to establish clear boundaries or reduce cross-cutting concerns. The goal is pragmatic maintainability and testability, avoiding unnecessary abstractions that add complexity without benefit.