cso

Audit security posture across code, dependencies, CI/CD, and infrastructure.

5|Updated Apr 24, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/timurgaleev/vibestack --skill cso-timurgaleev
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: cso
Source: https://github.com/timurgaleev/vibestack/tree/main/skills/cso
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/timurgaleev/vibestack --skill cso-timurgaleev

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Chief Security Officer-style guidance to systematically audit and report security posture across code, dependencies, CI/CD, and infrastructure, turning vague risk concerns into concrete remediation plans.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structured, end-to-end security posture reviews covering assets, configurations, and supply chain.
  • Actionable reports with severity ratings, remediation steps, and scope-defined analysis (infra/code/skills).
  • Repeatable workflows suitable for daily or monthly deep scans, with guardrails and traceable findings.

Quick Start

Run a daily CSO audit to generate a security posture report for your project.

Frequently Asked Questions about cso

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I perform a security audit on my codebase to identify infrastructure and CI/CD vulnerabilities?

A security audit systematically identifies posture risks across code, dependencies, CI/CD, and infrastructure using a repeatable CSO workflow. It scopes analysis to specific surfaces and produces actionable findings with severity ratings and concrete remediation steps.

What is the best way to generate a vulnerability report with concrete remediation steps for my project?

Generating a vulnerability report through a structured CSO audit yields severity-rated findings with scope-defined analysis. The deterministic workflow ensures repeatable deep scans that turn vague risk concerns into traceable, actionable remediation plans.

Can I run a security posture audit offline to preserve data privacy during risk analysis?

Security posture audits preserve data privacy and support offline analysis where possible. The deterministic workflow evaluates code, dependencies, and infrastructure locally, ensuring sensitive configurations remain protected while producing actionable risk findings.

Does this security audit workflow cover OWASP vulnerability risks and AI risk surfaces?

Security audits cover OWASP-aligned vulnerability risks and AI risk surfaces alongside code, dependencies, and infrastructure. The CSO workflow applies strict gating and risk scoring across all surfaces to produce comprehensive, actionable findings with remediation steps.

How do I scope a security audit to focus only on infrastructure risks instead of a full-text analysis?

Scoping a security audit to infrastructure risks involves tailoring the analysis scope within the CSO workflow to target specific surfaces like infra, code, or skills. This focused approach produces targeted findings with severity ratings rather than a full-text deep scan.

When should I run a full-text security audit versus a scoped CI/CD vulnerability review?

A full-text security audit is suited for monthly deep scans across all risk surfaces, while scoped CI/CD vulnerability reviews fit daily or targeted checks. Both use the repeatable CSO workflow with strict gating to produce severity-rated, actionable findings.