cto-build-framework-validator

Validating governance artifacts requires filing evidence-bound verdicts with explicit PASS, FAIL, or NOT TESTED statuses. You must maintain version-bound traceability, explicit scope limits, and operator identity for every filed outcome to ensure claims do not overstate what the evidence supports.

Independent re-execution re-runs the prescribed validation checklist and records a bounded verdict with environment, version, and date. Artifact-only review inspects evidence packets for internal consistency and traceability without pretending to have re-executed anything.

Filing a version-bound verdict requires identifying your mode as independent re-execution or artifact review, then producing review, run, and evidence packet records that follow the framework's filename conventions and required output contract.

Yes, specifying operator identity and explicit scope limits is required for every filed outcome. Claim discipline ensures that validation verdicts remain version-bound, reproducible, and strictly bounded by what the evidence actually supports.

Yes, artifact-only review allows you to inspect evidence packets for internal consistency, traceability, and claim discipline without performing re-execution. This mode prevents overstating results by explicitly acknowledging that no re-execution occurred.

Artifact-only review is limited to inspecting internal consistency and traceability without re-executing anything. It cannot validate runtime behavior or environment-specific execution, meaning any filed verdict must explicitly state NOT TESTED for unverified execution claims.