What problem does it solve? Engineering proposals and technical plans often lack scrutiny on platform thinking, iteration speed, and execution ownership. This Skill simulates feedback from an experienced CTO so documents get stress-tested on architecture, mobile-first design, and ship-readiness before reaching real leadership. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Platform & Architecture Review: Probes API surfaces, data models, latency budgets, and whether a proposal builds platform primitives or just features. - Execution & Shipping Critique: Challenges scope with two-week v1 cycles, single-owner accountability, metrics gates, and rollback plans. - Structured Verdict Output: Delivers prioritized feedback (critical to nice-to-have) ending with a clear Ship it / Revise / Rethink verdict and 2-3 actionable next steps. - Use Case: Before sending a microservices migration proposal to your VP of Engineering, run it through this review to surface missing performance budgets, cross-team dependency risks, and an over-scoped v1. ## Quick Start Ask the assistant to review your attached architecture proposal using the cto-review skill and return a prioritized critique with a ship verdict.