customaize-agent-test-prompt

Apply the RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycle to test AI agent prompts with isolated subagents.

Updated Mar 10, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Gamezar/opencode-cek --skill customaize-agent-test-prompt
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: customaize-agent-test-prompt
Source: https://github.com/Gamezar/opencode-cek/tree/main/plugins/customaize-agent/skills/customaize-agent-test-prompt
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Gamezar/opencode-cek --skill customaize-agent-test-prompt

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill ensures your AI prompts are clear, effective, and robust by applying the Test-Driven Development (TDD) cycle to prompt engineering, preventing costly errors and improving AI performance.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • TDD for Prompts: Implements the RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycle for prompt development.
  • Subagent Testing: Utilizes isolated subagents for reproducible and objective prompt evaluation.
  • Use Case: Before deploying a new command that guides an AI agent, use this Skill to write scenarios that expose its weaknesses, then refine the prompt until the agent consistently performs as expected, even under pressure.

Quick Start

Use the customaize-agent-test-prompt skill to test a new prompt by running it against a specific scenario without the prompt first to observe failures.

Frequently Asked Questions about customaize-agent-test-prompt

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How does TDD for prompt engineering work?

TDD for prompt engineering applies the RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycle to AI agent instructions, using isolated subagents to verify prompt clarity and robustness before deployment. It systematically identifies behavioral failures through iterative refinement and meta-testing.

How do I test AI agent prompts for robustness?

You test AI agent prompts for robustness by running them against specific scenarios using isolated subagents. This process exposes weaknesses by observing failures without the prompt first, then refining the instructions until the agent consistently performs as expected.

What is the best way to refine LLM prompts to enforce discipline?

The best way to refine LLM prompts to enforce discipline is using a TDD cycle that evaluates instruction adherence through isolated subagents. This systematically rectifies failures via iterative refinement, ensuring prompts produce desired behavior under pressure.

Can I use test-driven development for AI guidance and reference prompts?

Yes, you can use test-driven development for AI guidance and reference prompts. This Skill evaluates various prompt types by running scenarios that expose weaknesses, verifying instruction adherence and clarity through objective subagent testing.

Why do my AI agent prompts fail to produce consistent behavior?

AI agent prompts fail to produce consistent behavior when they lack clarity and robustness against edge cases. Applying a TDD methodology identifies these specific weaknesses through isolated subagent testing, allowing you to iteratively refine instructions for reliable performance.

Do I need to write scenarios before testing LLM instructions?

Yes, you need to write scenarios before testing LLM instructions to expose potential weaknesses. By observing how an AI agent fails without the prompt under specific conditions, you can systematically refine the instructions until the desired behavior is achieved.