cv-lab

Orchestrate multi-agent academic review workflows for computer vision LaTeX papers.

1|Updated Mar 5, 2026

Search Tags:#workflow #orchestration #latex #peer-review #computer-vision #academic-review #revision-planning

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/mobled37/claude-labs --skill cv-lab

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: cv-lab
Source: https://github.com/mobled37/claude-labs/tree/main/skills/cv-lab
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/mobled37/claude-labs --skill cv-lab

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill automates the end-to-end academic review workflow for computer vision LaTeX papers, coordinating multiple reviewer roles to streamline feedback and revisions.

Core Features & Use Cases

Orchestrates Professor, Peer, and Official Reviewer roles to produce a structured evaluation and revision plan.
Supports phase-based execution, inline comments, color-coded revisions, and a final decision gate.
Ideal for research teams preparing conference submissions or supervisors reviewing student papers.

Quick Start

Provide the path to your LaTeX project directory and optional threshold and max-rounds parameters to start the review pipeline.

Frequently Asked Questions about cv-lab

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I automate the peer-review workflow for a computer vision LaTeX paper?▼

You can automate the academic review workflow for computer vision LaTeX papers by orchestrating Professor, Peer, and Official Reviewer roles to produce structured evaluations, color-coded revisions, and a final decision gate.

Can I get inline comments and revision planning for my LaTeX paper project?▼

Yes, inline comments and revision planning are generated directly within your LaTeX paper project, applying document discovery to main.tex, bib, and figures to coordinate phase-based execution and round-based scoring.

What is the best way to coordinate multiple reviewer roles for academic paper revisions?▼

The best way to coordinate academic paper revisions is through a multi-agent orchestration workflow that schedules Professor, Peer, and Official Reviewer evaluations sequentially to satisfy end-to-end reproducibility.

Does the academic review workflow support threshold and max-rounds parameters?▼

Yes, you can configure the academic review workflow by providing optional threshold and max-rounds parameters alongside your LaTeX project directory path to control the revision pipeline depth.

When do I need a final decision gate in a computer vision paper review process?▼

A final decision gate is needed when finalizing conference submissions or supervising student papers, ensuring all Professor, Peer, and Official Reviewer feedback meets the required round-based scoring threshold before approval.