cv-lab

Orchestrate multi-agent academic review workflows for computer vision LaTeX papers.

1|Updated Mar 5, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/mobled37/claude-labs --skill cv-lab
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: cv-lab
Source: https://github.com/mobled37/claude-labs/tree/main/skills/cv-lab
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/mobled37/claude-labs --skill cv-lab

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill automates the end-to-end academic review workflow for computer vision LaTeX papers, coordinating multiple reviewer roles to streamline feedback and revisions.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Orchestrates Professor, Peer, and Official Reviewer roles to produce a structured evaluation and revision plan.
  • Supports phase-based execution, inline comments, color-coded revisions, and a final decision gate.
  • Ideal for research teams preparing conference submissions or supervisors reviewing student papers.

Quick Start

Provide the path to your LaTeX project directory and optional threshold and max-rounds parameters to start the review pipeline.

Frequently Asked Questions about cv-lab

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate the peer-review workflow for a computer vision LaTeX paper?

You can automate the academic review workflow for computer vision LaTeX papers by orchestrating Professor, Peer, and Official Reviewer roles to produce structured evaluations, color-coded revisions, and a final decision gate.

Can I get inline comments and revision planning for my LaTeX paper project?

Yes, inline comments and revision planning are generated directly within your LaTeX paper project, applying document discovery to main.tex, bib, and figures to coordinate phase-based execution and round-based scoring.

What is the best way to coordinate multiple reviewer roles for academic paper revisions?

The best way to coordinate academic paper revisions is through a multi-agent orchestration workflow that schedules Professor, Peer, and Official Reviewer evaluations sequentially to satisfy end-to-end reproducibility.

Does the academic review workflow support threshold and max-rounds parameters?

Yes, you can configure the academic review workflow by providing optional threshold and max-rounds parameters alongside your LaTeX project directory path to control the revision pipeline depth.

When do I need a final decision gate in a computer vision paper review process?

A final decision gate is needed when finalizing conference submissions or supervising student papers, ensuring all Professor, Peer, and Official Reviewer feedback meets the required round-based scoring threshold before approval.