cycle-grade

Grade closed ACE opportunity cycles by applying archetype-specific rubrics to evidence from GDrive artifacts. The process scores dimensions like intervention effectiveness and FLW performance, then generates a final grade report with actionable recommendations.

Assess ACE focus-group facilitation quality by applying tailored rubrics that score research yield and intervention effectiveness. This generates a clear report detailing what to adjust for the next focus-group cycle.

Yes, you can evaluate multi-stage ACE opportunities using GDrive artifacts. The grading mechanism applies tailored rubrics to score app quality and FLW performance specific to each opportunity type.

Automate ACE closeout workflows by generating a final grade report that writes to GDrive, updates the run state with a headline grade for downstream tools, and emails the admin group with full assessments and actionable recommendations.

Yes, cycle grading supports atomic-visit opportunity types. It applies specific rubrics to score intervention effectiveness and app quality, providing tailored criteria and per-skill suggestions for future runs.

Grading ACE opportunities with archetype rubrics is limited to atomic-visit, focus-group, and multi-stage opportunity types. It requires GDrive artifacts for evidence and targets closed cycles, not active runs.