cycle

Sequence engineering workflows across plan, audit, code, persona-test, ux-lock, and ship stages.

Updated Mar 25, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Lbstrydom/claude-engineering-skills --skill cycle-lbstrydom
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: cycle
Source: https://github.com/Lbstrydom/claude-engineering-skills/tree/main/.claude/skills/cycle
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Lbstrydom/claude-engineering-skills --skill cycle-lbstrydom

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Orchestrate the coordination of multi-step engineering workflows by sequencing the core skills (plan, audit-plan, audit-code, persona-test, ux-lock, ship), reducing manual handoffs and mistakes.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • End-to-end feature cycle orchestration across planning, auditing, implementation wait, code auditing, persona testing, UX locking, and shipping.
  • Deterministic workflow with safety constraints: never auto-fix across steps, ensure required audits occur, and honor user flags to skip steps as needed.
  • Ideal for starting new features or major fixes that require coordinated execution and traceable results.

Quick Start

Invoke the cycle workflow with a task description to run the full plan‑audit‑code‑persona‑uxlock‑ship chain.

Frequently Asked Questions about cycle

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I orchestrate end-to-end engineering workflows from planning to release?

End-to-end engineering workflows are orchestrated by sequencing atomic skills across plan, audit, code, persona-test, ux-lock, and ship stages. This deterministic cycle coordinates multi-step execution, reducing manual handoffs and ensuring required audits occur before release.

What is the best way to automate feature development cycles with safety constraints?

Automating feature development cycles safely requires a workflow that enforces safety rules to prevent auto-fixes and mandates user confirmation across steps. The cycle orchestrator applies these constraints across planning, auditing, implementation, and shipping stages for traceable results.

How do I coordinate planning, code auditing, and shipping for major software fixes?

Coordinating major fixes involves chaining explicit steps: plan, audit-plan, audit-code, persona-test, ux-lock, and ship. This sequence ensures code auditing and UX locking occur deterministically before release, reducing mistakes across frontend and backend development.

Can I skip specific stages like persona testing or UX locking during a feature cycle?

Yes, specific stages can be skipped by honoring user flags within the workflow. While the default cycle enforces required audits and safety constraints to prevent auto-fixes, it explicitly allows users to skip steps as needed during orchestration.

Does the feature cycle workflow support both frontend and backend development?

Yes, the feature cycle workflow applies to both frontend and backend development. It sequences end-to-end engineering work by coordinating planning, auditing, implementation, and release across atomic skills for any major feature or fix.