data-researcher

Gather and synthesize evidence from datasets, metrics, and data pipelines.

22|2|Updated Mar 24, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/jshsakura/awesome-opencode-skills --skill data-researcher-jshsakura
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: data-researcher
Source: https://github.com/jshsakura/awesome-opencode-skills/tree/main/skills/data-researcher
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/jshsakura/awesome-opencode-skills --skill data-researcher-jshsakura

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps teams gather and synthesize evidence from datasets, metrics, and data pipelines to support quantitative decisions.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Collect and evaluate data sources for relevance, freshness, and bias.
  • Synthesize findings into decision-ready conclusions with explicit uncertainty and caveats.
  • Use Case: Product analytics to justify a feature decision with measured metrics and data provenance.

Quick Start

Analyze the impact of a new retention metric by compiling sources, comparing baselines, and producing a concise recommendation.

Frequently Asked Questions about data-researcher

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I gather and synthesize evidence from datasets to support quantitative decisions?

To gather and synthesize evidence from datasets for quantitative decisions, you need to collect and evaluate data sources for relevance, freshness, and bias, then synthesize findings into decision-ready conclusions with explicit uncertainty and caveats.

What is the best way to evaluate data source quality for product analytics?

Evaluating data source quality for product analytics requires checking datasets for relevance, freshness, and bias to ensure evidence-based conclusions are reliable and include explicit assumptions and uncertainty.

How to analyze the impact of a new retention metric using data pipelines?

Analyzing a new retention metric involves compiling data pipeline sources, comparing baselines, and producing a concise recommendation with explicit data provenance and uncertainty.

Do I need clearly defined data sources for evidence-based decision-making?

Yes, evidence-based decision-making requires clearly defined data sources, standardized evaluation of source quality, and explicit assumptions to ground quantitative conclusions in solid data.

Why does synthesizing data findings require explicit uncertainty and caveats?

Synthesizing data findings requires explicit uncertainty and caveats because evidence-based conclusions depend on standardized source quality evaluation, and stating assumptions prevents overconfidence in quantitative decisions.