dbm-postauthor-concordance

To build an evidence bundle for post-authoring DBM review, provide the assembled DBM path, review output directory, domain root, publication schema, section map, and publication rules to execute deterministic substrate tools that validate and assemble standardized outputs.

Post-authoring concordance review is a reviewer-only workflow that reads assembled DBM sections and governed truth artifacts to surface candidate findings for human readiness judgment without modifying section outputs or the knowledge base.

DBM post-authoring validation generates seven outputs in the review directory: Evidence_Bundle_Summary.md, Section_Coverage.csv, Draft_Claims.csv, Body_Thinness.csv, TBD_Inventory.csv, Candidate_Findings.csv, and Publication_Review_Disposition.csv.

No, post-authoring review respects governance boundaries by not modifying DBM section outputs or the knowledge base. It only reads assembled DBM and governed truth artifacts to produce standardized review artifacts with dispositions recorded as TBD for human review.

Yes, post-authoring DBM review is suitable for DBM_PUBLISHER Gate 6 workflows and post-authoring validation. It targets pipeline-produced DBM sections within a defined scope to generate readiness artifacts for disposition review.

Dispositions are recorded as TBD in candidate findings because post-authoring review surfaces findings for human readiness judgment rather than automating decisions. A reviewer must manually evaluate the evidence bundle and assign final dispositions during the review process.