What problem does it solve?
Creators on platforms like Xiaohongshu, Douyin, and WeChat Channels often get content blocked, limited, or penalized without knowing why. This Skill separates two distinct questions—what the platform's automated moderation might flag versus what substantive problems the content itself has—and gives minimal, targeted fixes instead of blanket rewrites.
Core Features & Use Cases
- Two-layer risk review: Distinguishes machine-review triggers (links, contact info, QR codes, sensitive word lists, OCR noise) from substantive issues (fraud, false claims, unauthorized medical claims, privacy leaks, illegal diversion), so normal brand mentions are not mislabeled as violations.
- Minimal modification actions: Pinpoints the exact sentence or frame, explains the consequence, and suggests the smallest deletion, qualification, or official-channel alternative while preserving strong opinions, emotional tone, and hooks.
- Video overlay text: When context boundaries are genuinely needed, generates three lines of accurate on-screen disclaimer text (4-9 characters each) for videos.
- Use Case: Before posting a Xiaohongshu note promoting a consulting service, paste the draft to find out whether the contact info, price claims, or effect promises will trigger review—and get exact edits instead of a full rewrite.
Quick Start
Use dbs-content-risk-check to review this draft post before publishing, tell me what the platform's automated review might flag, what substantive problems exist, and give me the minimal fixes for each issue.
