What problem does it solve? Reviewing long documents or verifying that code matches documentation is tedious and error-prone when done ad hoc. This Skill turns document review into a structured, interactive Q&A session where every answer is visualized, every finding is recorded as a trackable TODO, and confirmed issues are routed into batched fix workflows. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Two review modes: pure document review (design, completeness, ambiguity) or document-code consistency review that verifies claims against the actual codebase via search subagents. - Visual answers with anchors: every answer includes Mermaid diagrams (flowchart, state, sequence, class) or an HTML server for complex architectures, plus clickable file/line anchors. - Dual-track recording: findings are saved as Logseq-format TODO items or LATER index entries, written incrementally so nothing is lost if the session ends. - Batched remediation: TODOs are classified as bug vs feature, grouped by module into batches of up to 5, routed to bug-fix or feature-development workflows, and each batch produces a verification summary document with a fix commit SHA. - Use Case: You hand the assistant a design spec and ask it to verify the codebase section by section; each confirmed mismatch becomes a prioritized TODO, and at the end the issues are fixed in parallel-safe batches with per-batch verification steps. ## Quick Start Ask the assistant to review a document interactively, for example: "Review the doc at docs/design/auth-spec.md against the codebase, section by section."
