Analyze rhetoric and identify fallacies during debates and negotiations.
npx skills add https://github.com/liigoQi/disco-elysium --skill de-rhetoric
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: de-rhetoric Source: https://github.com/liigoQi/disco-elysium/tree/main/codex-skills/de-rhetoric Command: npx skills add https://github.com/liigoQi/disco-elysium --skill de-rhetoric
This Skill helps simulate an inner-voice to craft persuasive dialogue, uncover logical gaps, and guide real-time reasoning during debates.
Start the inner-voice by stating the topic and asking for a concise, persuasive argument.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
To analyze inner rhetoric for persuasive dialogue, you need a mechanism that simulates an inner-voice to uncover logical gaps and guide real-time reasoning. This skill provides deterministic inner-voice prompts to identify fallacies and craft precise arguments.
The best way to identify logical fallacies and craft precise arguments is by invoking an inner-voice mechanism that analyzes rhetoric. This skill provides concise, pointed prompts to help articulate sharper arguments and anticipate counterpoints.
Yes, you can use a Disco Elysium style inner voice for critical thinking tasks. This skill simulates that specific inner-voice style to analyze rhetoric, identify fallacies, and generate a precise rhetorical line revealing underlying intents.
To start an inner-voice prompt for a persuasive argument, state your debate topic and ask for a concise argument. The skill respects user-provided topics and outputs a pointed rhetorical line to guide your reasoning.
No specific dependencies or environment setups are required to use this rhetoric analysis skill. It operates independently without external components, allowing immediate inner-voice simulation for debate and negotiation scenarios.
An inner-voice approach uncovers logical gaps by simulating deterministic, pointed prompts that actively reveal underlying intents. This differs from general communication tools by focusing specifically on real-time critical thinking and fallacy identification.
liigoQiGenerate a one-line inner-voice reply in [天人感应] [成功/失败] format.
Tnemo65Analyze scientific claims for validity using structured critical thinking frameworks.
liigoQiAnalyze arguments and detect logical fallacies in statements.
sandraschiEvaluate logical arguments for validity, soundness, and fallacies.
