Present strongest pro and con arguments on controversial topics.
npx skills add https://github.com/rar-file/surf --skill debate-coach
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: Debate Coach Source: https://github.com/rar-file/surf/tree/main/skills/debate_coach Command: npx skills add https://github.com/rar-file/surf --skill debate-coach
Provides balanced analysis of controversial topics by presenting strongest arguments for and against, helping users identify assumptions and assess evidence without bias.
Provide a topic and request balanced arguments with structured reasoning.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
To build balanced arguments for controversial topics, present the strongest pro and con points while identifying key assumptions and evaluating evidence quality to ensure transparent analysis.
Structured reasoning in critical thinking is a mechanism that balances opposing perspectives by evaluating evidence quality and identifying tensions, ensuring safe and transparent analysis of any topic.
To identify assumptions and bias in policy discussions, apply perspective-taking to assess evidence quality on each side, exposing tensions and hidden biases without requiring external data.
Yes, you can use argument analysis for classroom debate preparation, as it generates clear reasoning for both sides and highlights evidence quality to support educational discussions.
No, balanced argument generation requires no external data sources beyond your topic inputs, relying entirely on internal reasoning guidelines to ensure safe and transparent analysis.
lv416eDecompose topics into researchable components and synthesize evidence-based conclusions.
wjgoarxivRun adversarial two-researcher debates with judge-scored rounds and structured reports.
toilahuonggAnalyze arguments, detect fallacies, and evaluate claims using structured reasoning frameworks.
swaruplabEvaluate scientific claims and evidence quality using GRADE and ROBINS-I criteria.
