skills.rest
colings86
colings86COMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

debate

Orchestrate multi-agent AI debates with configurable roles and real-time fact-checking.

Updated Feb 21, 2026
Search Tags:#fact-checking#multi-agent#argumentation#claude code plugin#ai debate#structured debate
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/colings86/ai-debate --skill debate-colings86
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: debate
Source: https://github.com/colings86/ai-debate/tree/main/plugins/ai-debate/skills/debate
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/colings86/ai-debate --skill debate-colings86

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) and assets (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill enables structured, multi-agent AI debates on any topic, complete with fact-checking and performance assessment.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • AI-Powered Debates: Facilitates structured arguments between specialized AI agents (Chair, Debaters, Reporter, Verifier, Audience, Assessor).
  • Real-time Fact-Checking: The Verifier agent cross-references cited sources during the debate.
  • Use Case: Set up a debate on the ethics of AI in judicial decisions, with configurable debaters and real-time source verification.

Quick Start

Initiate a debate on the topic 'Should artificial intelligence be used to make judicial decisions?'.

Frequently Asked Questions about debate

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I set up a multi-agent AI debate with real-time fact-checking?▼

To set up a multi-agent AI debate, you define a topic and configure specialized agent roles like Chair, Debaters, and Verifier. The system orchestrates turn-taking and cross-references cited sources during the debate.

Does running a structured AI debate require specific experimental features in Claude Code?▼

Running a structured AI debate requires Claude Code with the Agent Teams experimental feature enabled. You also need system access to bash, python3, and flock to manage the multi-agent orchestration.

Can I customize the personas and roles of agents participating in an AI debate?▼

You can customize the AI debate by configuring persona-driven debaters and assigning specialized roles. The system supports agents like Chair, Reporter, Verifier, Audience, and Assessor for post-debate analysis.

What is the best way to analyze and verify the arguments generated during an AI debate?▼

To analyze and verify AI debate arguments, the system uses specialized agents. The Verifier agent performs real-time fact-checking during the debate, while the Assessor agent conducts post-debate performance evaluation.

What are the limitations of using multi-agent argumentation for complex topics?▼

A limitation of multi-agent argumentation is its dependency on specific system environments. It requires bash, python3, and flock access, and relies on the Claude Code Agent Teams experimental feature to function properly.

Related Skills

Explore More Content & Communication Skills→
Thanh-aperoThanh-apero
1

team

Orchestrate parallel Claude Code sessions for collaborative research, code review, and debugging.

Community
Advanced
acefrost511acefrost511

self-improving-agent

Analyze conversational sessions to generate learning logs and weekly improvement reports.

Community
Advanced
fredmilhomefredmilhome

verify-claims

Extract factual claims from markdown drafts and verify them via an external agent.

Community
Advanced
cbbkrd-techcbbkrd-tech

ln-513-agent-reviewer

Run parallel external agent reviews on code changes and return verified suggestions.

Community
Advanced