Orchestrate multi-model expert challenges against Claude's position and produce ADR-ready decision records.
npx skills add https://github.com/nalyk/nalyk-skills-demo --skill debate-nalyk
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: debate Source: https://github.com/nalyk/nalyk-skills-demo/tree/main/plugins/debate Command: npx skills add https://github.com/nalyk/nalyk-skills-demo --skill debate-nalyk
Multi-model adversarial debate for high-stakes decisions, surfacing blind spots and diverse perspectives to improve outcomes.
Initiate a debate by providing a topic to trigger a multi-model critique and produce an auditable decision record.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
Multi-model debate improves architecture and security decisions by orchestrating parallel critiques from distinct expert challengers against an initial position. This adversarial process surfaces blind spots and diverse perspectives, evolving the original stance into a robust, consensus-driven outcome.
To generate an auditable ADR for product strategy, initiate a debate by providing your topic. The process runs prefight checks and parallel critiques, concluding with a formal consensus or tradeoff output that is directly formatted as an Architecture Decision Record.
Yes, you can configure the debate behavior locally. The Skill supports a local debate.local.md file, allowing you to adjust parameters for prefight checks, parallel challenge phases, and optional confrontation rounds to suit your decision-support workflow.
Consensus checks determine if challenger critiques align with the original position to reach agreement, while tradeoff outputs document unresolved differences as formal concessions. Both provide auditable ADR-ready records for high-stakes architecture and security decisions.
Use multi-model adversarial critique for high-stakes architecture, product strategy, and security decisions where diverse perspectives reduce blind spots. Rely on single expert analysis for straightforward tasks lacking the complexity to warrant parallel challenger confrontation rounds.
yu13130122297Identify uncertainties in research framing, datasets, metrics, and baselines.
loriensleafsCoordinate six agents to review Architecture Decision Records and produce MADR 4.0 compliant updates.
rysweetFacilitate structured multi-perspective debates for architectural decisions.
makinuxRun multi-model adversarial reviews with cross-critique and calibrated synthesis.
