decision-council

Reduce bias in complex design decisions by using a structured process that spawns three adversarial subagents with differing value functions to challenge assumptions, followed by a synthesis pass to identify blind spots.

Get structured feedback on scope decisions by invoking an adversarial subagent process that provides three independent perspectives and a final synthesis pass to evaluate whether a feature should be included.

Yes, you can use adversarial subagents for deciding whether to include a feature in a pull request by providing your decision question and relevant context to generate a structured recommendation.

The synthesis pass works by having a final agent review the opinions of three adversarial subagents to identify blind spots and produce a comprehensive evaluation of a non-trivial design or scope decision.

You should not use an adversarial subagent approach for trivial decisions, as it requires careful framing and clear context to be effective for complex design or scope decisions where multiple perspectives are needed.