skills.rest
marqus0004
marqus0004COMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

decision-critic

Stress-test decisions by decomposing claims, generating counterpoints, and issuing verdicts.

Updated Feb 6, 2026
Search Tags:#architecture#decision#critique#structured-thinking#risk-analysis#stress-test#logic-verification
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/marqus0004/LifeIsRoadBlocks --skill decision-critic-marqus0004
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: decision-critic
Source: https://github.com/marqus0004/LifeIsRoadBlocks/tree/main/skills/decision-critic
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/marqus0004/LifeIsRoadBlocks --skill decision-critic-marqus0004

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Stress-tests decisions and their reasoning to surface weaknesses and assumptions.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Decomposition: breaks down decisions into claims, assumptions, and constraints.
  • Verification & Challenge: generates independent checks and adversarial counterpoints.
  • Synthesis: delivers a clear verdict with recommendations and risk flags.
  • Use Case: product roadmap decisions, architecture options, technology selections.

Quick Start

Provide a decision statement and trigger the decision-critic workflow to start structured critique.

Frequently Asked Questions about decision-critic

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I stress-test an architecture decision before committing?▼

Stress-testing an architecture decision requires structured critique that decomposes choices into claims and assumptions, verifies constraints, and generates adversarial counterpoints to surface hidden risks before synthesis.

What is adversarial critique and how does it improve technology selection?▼

Adversarial critique improves technology selection by generating independent checks against your assumptions and challenging the reasoning behind a decision to deliver a verdict with actionable risk flags.

How do I critique a product roadmap decision step by step?▼

Critique a product roadmap decision by passing the statement through structured phases: decompose into claims, verify logic, challenge with counterpoints, and synthesize a final verdict with recommendations.

Can I use structured thinking to evaluate strategic bets and trade-offs?▼

Structured thinking evaluates strategic bets and trade-offs by breaking down the decision, applying logic verification, and synthesizing results into a clear verdict with actionable items and risk flags.

When should I use adversarial decision critique instead of standard analysis?▼

Use adversarial decision critique instead of standard analysis when facing architectural choices or technology selections where surfacing hidden assumptions and stress-testing reasoning improves outcomes.

Related Skills

Explore More Product & Management Skills→
JuanMS20JuanMS20

one-three-one-rule

Structure technical decisions into a problem, three options, and a recommendation.

Community
Intermediate
RheasilviaRheasilvia

spike

Validate technical feasibility through disposable prototype experiments.

Community
Intermediate
sachio222sachio222

decision-critic

Stress-test decisions through structured adversarial critique phases.

Community
Advanced
chrono-metachrono-meta
7

deliberation

Synthesize conflicting viewpoints into conditional verdicts with adversarial challenge workflows.

Community
Advanced