decision-critic

To stress-test a product decision, you decompose it into claims, assumptions, and constraints, then apply adversarial critique to surface hidden reasoning gaps. This structured analysis generates contrarian perspectives and a final verdict to ensure verifiable decision-making.

Structured decision critique is a systematic workflow that extracts and verifies claims, assumptions, and judgments using stable IDs. You need it for product, project, or strategy decisions to expose hidden assumptions and surface counter-arguments before execution.

Decision verification works across product, project, and strategy decisions. The workflow applies independent verification questions and adversarial analysis to any context, ensuring traceable outputs and rigorous status marking regardless of the specific domain.

To run adversarial analysis, load your decision context, extract the core judgments, and generate contrarian perspectives alongside alternative problem framings. The process marks each claim VERIFIED, FAILED, or UNCERTAIN to produce a final STAND, REVISE, or ESCALATE verdict.

The best way to ensure traceability is assigning stable IDs to extracted claims and assumptions, then tracking them through evidence-based verification. This auditable process includes tool references and rationale to enable full reproducibility of the final verdict.