decision-doc

Architecture Decision Records provide a structured, persistent record of significant architecture decisions, capturing context, explored options, rationale, and long-term consequences to prevent repeated debates and misalignment among stakeholders.

An Architecture Decision Record for a major refactor must define the problem, list at least three options, compare trade-offs, justify the decision with reasoning, document reversibility and consequences, and include metadata such as date and status.

You need to create an Architecture Decision Record for decisions involving architecture, deployments, tech choices, or major refactors, documenting them for future readers to ensure traceability and stakeholder alignment.

Write an ADR by defining the problem, listing at least three options with clear trade-offs, and justifying the final decision with reasoning, which communicates architecture decisions effectively to both technical and non-technical stakeholders.

Yes, an Architecture Decision Record must document reversibility and potential migration paths, recording the decision rationale, date, status, and long-term consequences for future reference and traceability.

The best way to capture durable architecture decisions is producing Architecture Decision Records that document context, options, decision, trade-offs, and consequences, applying criteria to avoid AI references and ensure traceability.