decision-helper

A weighted decision matrix evaluates 2-4 options against weighted criteria to produce a ranked recommendation. It transforms gut feel into measurable scores, detecting close calls where differences are marginal to prompt further analysis.

Use a weighted decision matrix for technology vendor selection and design trade-offs when comparing 2-4 options. It enforces option limits and alignment constraints, ensuring structured, transparent evaluation instead of subjective preference.

Document trade-off analysis by persisting weighted scoring outcomes to ADR or task plans. This ensures auditability and creates a historical record explaining why specific architectural or technology choices were selected.

No, the decision matrix enforces a maximum of four options per evaluation. This constraint maintains analytical focus and prevents scoring dilution when performing architectural trade-off analysis.

When weighted scores are close, the matrix detects the close call and surfaces marginal differences. This prompts further analysis rather than blindly accepting a winner, ensuring narrow scoring gaps receive appropriate scrutiny.