decision-prompt-builder

Generate trade-off questions for human judgment at modeling decision gates.

452|24|Updated Apr 26, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/zhnnky329/MathModeling-skills --skill decision-prompt-builder
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: decision-prompt-builder
Source: https://github.com/zhnnky329/MathModeling-skills/tree/main/.claude/skills/decision-prompt-builder
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/zhnnky329/MathModeling-skills --skill decision-prompt-builder

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill enforces human modeling judgment at key gates by surfacing 2-3 trade-off questions before any AI-suggested action, ensuring the human remains in the decision loop and the AI supports consequences rather than dictates outcomes.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Trade-off question generation: identifies the single highest-impact judgment at a gate and produces 2-3 questions framed as trade-offs.
  • Human-in-the-loop governance: prevents rubber-stamping by withholding AI suggestions until the human answers.
  • Decision-artifact integration: outputs answers to downstream decision artifacts and logs for auditing and traceability.
  • Use Case: at G1 framing, G2 method choice, or G4.5 result verdict, this skill ensures the human owns the decision space.

Quick Start

Identify the judgment gate, generate up to three trade-off questions, and hand the human answers to the downstream decision artifact.

Frequently Asked Questions about decision-prompt-builder

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I prevent rubber-stamping in human-in-the-loop AI workflows?

To prevent rubber-stamping in human-in-the-loop AI workflows, surface 2-3 trade-off questions at key judgment gates before the AI offers any recommendations, forcing human modelers to actively own the decision space.

What is a decision prompt for AI safety and modeling judgment?

A decision prompt for AI safety is a mechanism that surfaces minimal, high-impact trade-off questions at judgment gates, ensuring human reasoning guides AI outputs rather than automatically accepting suggested actions.

How do I generate trade-off questions for problem framing and method choice gates?

Generate trade-off questions for problem framing and method choice gates by identifying the single highest-impact judgment required, then producing up to three questions framed as trade-offs for the human modeler to answer.

Does this approach require the AI to pre-fill decision artifacts?

No, this approach does not require the AI to pre-fill decision artifacts or answer the questions itself, preserving human reasoning by withholding AI suggestions and requiring the downstream system to capture human responses.

When should I enforce human modeling judgment in prompt design?

Enforce human modeling judgment in prompt design at any gate where modeling judgments are required, such as problem framing, method choice, result verdict, or claim scope, to ensure the human remains in the decision loop.

Can I use this for auditing and traceability of AI decision logs?

Yes, you can use this for auditing and traceability by integrating the human answers from the trade-off questions into downstream decision artifacts and logs, ensuring every judgment gate is recorded for review.