decision-toolkit

Generate interactive HTML decision guides with bias audits and scenario matrices.

6|2|Updated Feb 17, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/dandaka/skills --skill decision-toolkit-dandaka
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: decision-toolkit
Source: https://github.com/dandaka/skills/tree/main/decision-toolkit
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/dandaka/skills --skill decision-toolkit-dandaka

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Decision Toolkit turns ambiguous, high-stakes choices into a guided, structured process so decision-makers can surface assumptions, spot biases, compare scenarios, and leave with concrete next steps rather than open-ended analysis paralysis.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Interactive HTML Wizard: One-question-per-screen progressive flow with state persistence, keyboard navigation, and print-friendly output for collaborative or solo decision sessions.
  • Bias Audit & Frameworks: Built-in bias checklists, first-principles tests, pre-mortem prompts, 10-10-10 and regret-minimization modules to make reasoning explicit.
  • Scenario & Cost Calculators: Scenario matrices and opportunity-cost calculators that quantify trade-offs and expected value across alternatives.
  • Export Templates: Generate markdown decision records, voice-summary scripts (Orpheus TTS), and PDF-ready reports using provided templates.
  • Accessibility & Cultural Framing: HTML templates prioritize ARIA roles, reduced-motion support, screen-reader friendliness, and options for individualist vs collectivist framing.
  • Use Cases: Choosing between job offers, evaluating partnerships or investments, prioritizing projects, tool selection, and resource allocation decisions.

Quick Start

Create a decision toolkit for choosing between two job offers, producing an interactive HTML guide, a concise markdown record, and a 5-paragraph voice summary.

Frequently Asked Questions about decision-toolkit

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I structure complex decision-making for career or investment choices?

Structured decision-making for career or investment choices uses interactive HTML wizards, scenario matrices, and opportunity-cost calculators to quantify trade-offs and produce concrete next steps. This prevents analysis paralysis by surfacing assumptions and biases.

Can I generate an interactive HTML decision guide with bias audits and scenario planning?

Yes, you can generate an interactive HTML decision guide featuring progressive one-question-per-screen wizards, built-in bias audits, pre-mortem prompts, and scenario matrices. The output includes state persistence, keyboard navigation, and print-friendly formats.

What is the best way to compare opportunity costs across multiple project priorities?

The best way to compare opportunity costs across project priorities is using a scenario matrix and opportunity-cost calculator. This approach quantifies expected value across alternatives and pairs with regret-minimization modules to make trade-offs explicit.

Does the decision toolkit support accessible HTML output for screen readers?

Yes, the decision toolkit supports accessible HTML output by prioritizing ARIA roles, reduced-motion support, and screen-reader friendliness. It also includes options for individualist versus collectivist cultural framing in the generated guides.

How do I export a decision record to markdown, PDF, and voice summary formats?

You can export a decision record to markdown, PDF-ready reports, and voice-summary scripts using template-driven exports. The voice summaries are designed for Orpheus TTS, while markdown and PDF formats document the structured decision process.

When should I use a pre-mortem prompt in scenario planning?

Use a pre-mortem prompt in scenario planning when evaluating high-stakes choices like partnerships or tool selection. It helps surface hidden assumptions and biases by imagining potential failures before committing to a specific alternative.