Generate investor-ready pitch decks from BRIEF.md with Marp markdown and multi-critic review.
npx skills add https://github.com/rjwalters/anvil --skill deck-rjwalters
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: deck Source: https://github.com/rjwalters/anvil/tree/main/anvil/skills/deck Command: npx skills add https://github.com/rjwalters/anvil --skill deck-rjwalters
Pitch decks are easy to write badly: they overflow visually, lack a coherent narrative, make unsupported market claims, and include traction/team numbers that can’t be defended during diligence.
Run the full lifecycle for a thread named acme-seed by executing deck-brief acme-seed, then deck-draft acme-seed, then deck-figures acme-seed, then deck-review acme-seed, and finally deck-revise acme-seed until the verdict advances.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
To generate an investor pitch deck, this Skill uses Marp markdown to create slide source plus speaker notes, then renders a deck.pdf with deterministic figures. It follows a structured drafting, rendering, and multi-critic review lifecycle to ensure the output is investor-ready.
The no-fabrication brief converts founder-provided references into a structured BRIEF.md contract. This prevents the drafter from inventing numbers, names, logos, or assets, ensuring all traction and team claims can be defended during diligence.
The best way to review a pitch deck is running parallel critics for narrative arc, ask specificity, market math, and design polish. The multi-critic review scores problem clarity, traction, and team credibility, then aggregates findings into an advance or block verdict.
To validate rendered PDF pitch decks, this Skill checks rendered artifacts for overflow, label cropping, axis legibility, palette adherence, and mathtext artifacts. It renders deterministic figures and the final deck.pdf to catch design issues.
Yes, you can use Marp to produce fundraising pitch decks with automated revision planning. The lifecycle production creates Marp slide source, scores it with critical-flag logic, and generates revision plans across parallel critics until the verdict advances.
A limitation of using automated critics for pitch deck revision is that the process requires strict adherence to a no-fabrication BRIEF.md contract. The critics cannot validate claims outside the provided brief and rely on deterministic rendering to catch visual design issues.
narumirunaOrganize Marp/Marpit authoring guidance for slide creation.
savvidesEvaluate edtech founder pitches and generate investor-ready reviews with scorecards.
giosuetedeschi-specSerialize task plans, findings, and progress to persistent markdown files.
soulianeGenerate presentation slides from Markdown files using Marp CLI.
