deep-design

Coordinate multi-perspective design reviews and produce revised documents with actionable findings.

Updated Mar 1, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/dnhess/spectra --skill deep-design
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: deep-design
Source: https://github.com/dnhess/spectra/tree/main/deep-design
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/dnhess/spectra --skill deep-design

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Orchestrates a structured, multi-agent design review to stress-test documents, specs, or ideas from every angle and produce a revised document that incorporates all findings as actionable conclusions.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structured multi-agent critique: A coordinated review with diverse perspectives to surface design flaws and improvement opportunities.
  • Blackboard collaboration: A shared session where agents write outputs to a centralized log, ensuring traceable, convergent discussion.
  • Output synthesis: Generates a revised document or checklist that integrates findings, with traceable rationale and next steps.
  • Use Case: Ideal for evaluating complex architecture designs, PRDs, or feature proposals before implementation, ensuring robust coverage of concerns.

Quick Start

Prompt the system to run a deep-design review on the provided document and return a consolidated revised document with findings.

Frequently Asked Questions about deep-design

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I run a multi-perspective design review on an architecture spec?

Run a multi-perspective design review by prompting the system to evaluate your architecture spec, which coordinates diverse agents to stress-test the document and outputs a revised version with actionable findings.

What is a blackboard architecture for design document revision?

A blackboard architecture for design revision is a shared session where multiple agents write critique outputs to a centralized log, ensuring traceable rationale and convergent discussion for finalized document updates.

Can I use a multi-agent review for product requirements documents before implementation?

Yes, you can use a multi-agent review for product requirements documents to enforce structured critique, trace each finding to source context, and produce a revised PRD with actionable recommendations before implementation.

What's the best way to stress-test a feature proposal from multiple angles?

The best way to stress-test a feature proposal from multiple angles is applying a coordinated, multi-agent critique that surfaces design flaws and improvement opportunities, synthesizing outputs into a consolidated revised document.

Does a structured multi-perspective design review require any specific dependencies?

No, a structured multi-perspective design review requires no specific dependencies or components, operating independently to coordinate agent prompts and generate finalized revised documents with traceable rationale.

When should I not use an automated multi-agent design review?

You should not use an automated multi-agent design review for simple documents not intended for implementation, as the structured critique and blackboard collaboration overhead provides most value for complex architecture designs and feature proposals.