deep-dive

To investigate ambiguous problems and crystallize a precise specification, you orchestrate parallel trace lanes and an injection-based interview. This process synthesizes gathered evidence to convert undefined root causes into a standard deep-interview spec document.

The best way to identify root causes in brownfield projects before writing requirements is running three parallel evidence-gathering trace lanes. Simultaneous exploration surfaces underlying issues, enabling you to define accurate requirements with reduced ambiguity and rework.

To start a deep problem investigation workflow, you describe the problem to initiate the process. You then confirm hypotheses and start the trace-interview pipeline, which generates a specification ready for downstream planning and execution flows.

Yes, deep problem investigation works for both greenfield and brownfield projects. It applies parallel trace lanes and evidence synthesis to identify root causes before requirements generation, ensuring precise specifications across any project context.

Trace-to-spec injection works by feeding trace findings directly into the interview prompt. This seeds targeted questions and context, allowing the interview to crystallize a precise specification from the synthesized evidence gathered during the parallel trace exploration.

Yes, you can bridge the generated specification directly into planning and autopilot flows. The execution bridge produces a path to omc-plan and autopilot, enabling end-to-end delivery from problem investigation to working code.