deep-research

Conduct multi-source research and synthesize evidence into structured reports.

Updated Jun 20, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/4tie/fortiesr --skill deep-research-4tie
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: deep-research
Source: https://github.com/4tie/fortiesr/tree/main/.local/secondary_skills/deep-research
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/4tie/fortiesr --skill deep-research-4tie

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps answer complex questions that need more than a quick lookup by gathering, evaluating, and synthesizing evidence from multiple credible sources into a clear report.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Multi-source research across web results, reports, and reference material.
  • Source credibility scoring, triangulation, and conflict resolution.
  • Structured reporting for market analysis, technology evaluation, fact-checking, due diligence, and literature reviews.
  • Example: compare competing strategies, verify a controversial claim, or survey an industry landscape with cited findings.

Quick Start

Ask for a deep research report on your topic and specify the audience, depth, and any constraints you want considered.

Frequently Asked Questions about deep-research

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I conduct multi-source research and synthesize conflicting evidence into a structured report?

Multi-source research synthesizes evidence by applying source credibility scoring, triangulation, and citation tracking to resolve conflicting data and generate structured reports for complex topics like market analysis and fact-checking.

What is source triangulation and when do I need it for fact-checking?

Source triangulation cross-references multiple credible sources to verify claims and resolve conflicting evidence. It is needed for fact-checking controversial claims, comparative evaluation, and due diligence where accuracy is critical.

How do I compare competing strategies or evaluate an industry landscape with cited findings?

Comparing competing strategies requires broad web search and gap analysis to survey an industry landscape. Evidence is evaluated through source credibility scoring and compiled into structured reports with tracked citations.

Can I use this approach for literature reviews and academic research questions?

Yes, this approach suits literature reviews and academic research questions by conducting multi-source research across reference material, applying source credibility scoring, and synthesizing cited findings into structured reports.

What is the best way to handle conflicting evidence during complex topic analysis?

Handling conflicting evidence requires source credibility scoring and triangulation to evaluate discrepancies. Gap analysis identifies missing data, ensuring the final structured report transparently documents conflicts and resolutions.

Does this deep research method work for technology evaluation and decision support across different industries?

Yes, this method works for technology evaluation and decision support across industries. It applies multi-source research, comparative evaluation, and structured reporting to synthesize evidence for complex landscape analysis.