Deep Research

To synthesize web research with confidence levels, you can generate multi-source reports that tier source credibility and assign per-finding confidence scores based on evidence corroboration. This process combines 5 to 50 sources into a decision-ready synthesis.

To detect contradictions across research sources, you can map falsifiable claims and highlight conflicting positions with clearly labeled supporting evidence. This approach emphasizes analyst-grade evidence over single-source assertions.

Yes, you can run a quick landscape scan using a shallow depth mode that ingests about 5 sources to produce a roughly 600-word report. This provides fast topic coverage for quick analyst-grade discovery.

Source credibility tiering for evidence reviews classifies sources as primary, secondary, or tertiary, then scores them on Authority, Recency, and Verifiability. This assigns credibility tiers like T1, T2, or T3 to each source.

Shallow mode synthesizes around 5 sources into 600 words for quick coverage, while deep mode ingests 30 to 50 sources to produce a 3,000 to 5,000-word exhaustive report. Both modes apply credibility tiering and per-finding confidence.

To structure a research report with falsifiable claims, you generate a structured format saved to an articles directory that includes explicit contradiction detection and debate mapping. This highlights opposing positions with their supporting sources.