deep-research

Convert research questions into structured, sourced conclusions with evidence tracking.

11|2|Updated Jun 25, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/cklxx/elephant.ai --skill deep-research-cklxx
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: deep-research
Source: https://github.com/cklxx/elephant.ai/tree/main/skills/deep-research
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/cklxx/elephant.ai --skill deep-research-cklxx

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill helps teams perform deep, traceable research by converting questions into structured, sourced conclusions.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Question framing: Define the problem and success criteria with auditable hypotheses.
  • Multi-source validation: Plan and execute searches across official docs, standards, papers, datasets, and credible sources; track findings and conflicts.
  • Structured output: Deliver evidence-backed conclusions and actionable recommendations with traceable references.

Quick Start

Provide a clear research prompt or topic, then request a structured findings memo with evidence and recommendations.

Frequently Asked Questions about deep-research

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I conduct deep research with multi-source validation for complex topics?

Deep research with multi-source validation converts complex questions into structured conclusions by planning searches across official docs, standards, papers, and datasets. It tracks findings and conflicts to deliver evidence-backed decision recommendations.

What is structured output in traceable research and how does it support decision-making?

Structured output in traceable research provides evidence-backed conclusions and actionable recommendations with traceable references. It supports decision-making by framing problems with auditable hypotheses and assigning confidence judgments to evaluated options.

How do I frame research questions and define success criteria for systematic investigation?

Framing research questions involves defining the problem and establishing success criteria through auditable hypotheses. This systematic approach ensures your investigation planning aligns with multi-source evidence collection and clear decision recommendations.

Can I use evidence tracking to resolve conflicts across official docs, standards, and datasets?

Evidence tracking resolves conflicts across official docs, standards, and datasets by planning and executing targeted searches. It systematically logs findings and discrepancies from credible sources to validate conclusions for decision support.

What is the best way to generate a structured findings memo with traceable references?

Generating a structured findings memo requires providing a clear research prompt or topic to systematically process. The output delivers sourced conclusions, actionable recommendations, and traceable references with confidence judgments for decision support.

When should I not use systematic multi-source research for problem-solving?

Systematic multi-source research should be avoided for simple, single-answer queries lacking conflicting evidence. It is designed for complex topics requiring deep validation, evidence tracking, and structured decision recommendations across multiple credible sources.