deep-research

Orchestrate 13-agent academic research workflows from question formulation to APA 7.0 reports.

3|Updated Mar 31, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/CRDong233/academic_helper --skill deep-research-crdong233
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: deep-research
Source: https://github.com/CRDong233/academic_helper/tree/main/skills/academic-research-skills-main/deep-research
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/CRDong233/academic_helper --skill deep-research-crdong233

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Deep-research coordinates a 13-agent, end-to-end research pipeline that brings structure, rigor, and reproducibility to academic investigations across topics. It unifies scoping, literature search, evidence verification, synthesis, and reporting into a single orchestrated workflow.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • 13-agent team covering phases from problem framing to post-research monitoring, including full research, lit-review, systematic reviews, meta-analysis, quick briefs, paper reviews, and Socratic dialogue.
  • Trigger-based activation in multiple languages, with governance rules, synthesis and editorial checks, and ethics/attribution safeguards.
  • Handoffs to downstream writing tools (e.g., academic-paper) with structured data exchange for streamlined publication.

Quick Start

Provide a topic and I'll start the end-to-end deep-research workflow.

Frequently Asked Questions about deep-research

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate a systematic literature review end-to-end?

Automate a systematic literature review by triggering an orchestrated research workflow that handles scoping, evidence verification, and synthesis. This multi-agent pipeline structures the entire systematic review process from question formulation to final report generation.

Can I use multi-agent orchestration for meta-analysis and evidence synthesis?

Yes, multi-agent orchestration supports meta-analysis and evidence synthesis by coordinating specialized agents across research phases. The workflow applies governance rules and ethics safeguards to verify evidence and synthesize findings reproducibly.

What is the best way to structure academic writing with PRISMA guidelines?

Structure academic writing with PRISMA guidelines by using a coordinated research pipeline that integrates evidence verification and synthesis checks. The workflow outputs structured data that aligns with PRISMA reporting standards for systematic reviews.

Does this deep-research workflow support APA 7.0 report generation?

Yes, the deep-research workflow supports APA 7.0 report generation by orchestrating the research phases from problem framing to final editorial checks. It formats the synthesized evidence into an APA 7.0 compliant report.

How do I conduct a quick literature brief instead of a full systematic review?

Conduct a quick literature brief by selecting the quick brief mode within the orchestrated research workflow. This mode bypasses the exhaustive phases of a full systematic review to rapidly synthesize key literature on your topic.

What are the limitations of using automated agents for academic research?

Automated agents for academic research require clear topic inputs to function effectively and depend on downstream writing tools for final publication formatting. Users must still manually verify governance and attribution safeguards for complex academic investigations.