deep-research

Name: deep-research
Availability: InStock
Author: franklee16

Synthesize multi-source findings into a cited research report with consensus and debate sections.

203|27|Updated Apr 19, 2026

Search Tags:#research reporting #academic writing #deep research #source evaluation #literature synthesis #cited analysis

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/franklee16/academic-research-skills --skill deep-research-franklee16

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: deep-research
Source: https://github.com/franklee16/academic-research-skills/tree/main/literature-review/deep-research
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/franklee16/academic-research-skills --skill deep-research-franklee16

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

It solves the problem of turning many scattered references into a single, coherent, evidence-based analysis with clear citations for the reader.

Core Features & Use Cases

Multi-source synthesis with citations: Combines findings across viewpoints and documents while tracking sources via numbered citations.
Structured research workflow: Guides you from clarifying the research question to identifying gaps and further research needs.
Credibility-aware source evaluation: Emphasizes assessing peer-reviewed, official, and reputable materials and noting uncertainty.

Quick Start

Use the deep-research skill to research and synthesize evidence on your topic, producing an executive summary, detailed analysis, consensus vs. debate, and a fully cited sources list.

Frequently Asked Questions about deep-research

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I synthesize multiple research sources into a cited report?▼

To synthesize multiple research sources into a cited report, combine findings across viewpoints while tracking sources via numbered citations, producing structured outputs with consensus, debate, and source evaluation sections.

What is the best way to evaluate source credibility for academic writing?▼

The best way to evaluate source credibility for academic writing is to assess peer-reviewed, official, and reputable materials while explicitly noting uncertainty and documenting source quality within the research report.

Can I generate a comparative analysis of literature with consensus and debate sections?▼

Yes, you can generate a comparative literature analysis that identifies consensus versus debate sections, evaluating viewpoints across documents while tracking numbered citations to address specific research questions.

How does deep research identify gaps and further research needs?▼

Deep research identifies gaps and further research needs by guiding a structured workflow from clarifying the research question to evaluating multi-source findings, ultimately documenting missing evidence and future investigation requirements.

Are there limitations when synthesizing scattered references into evidence-based analysis?▼

A limitation when synthesizing scattered references into evidence-based analysis is the dependency on the availability and quality of peer-reviewed sources, requiring explicit documentation of uncertainty when source materials lack definitive consensus.