deep-research

Synthesize multi-source research into cited reports with confidence scoring.

3|Updated Apr 18, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/garochee33/DSH --skill deep-research-garochee33
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: deep-research
Source: https://github.com/garochee33/DSH/tree/main/agents/skills/deep-research
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/garochee33/DSH --skill deep-research-garochee33

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill solves the challenge of doing rigorous, multi-source research without losing track of evidence, contradictions, or coverage gaps. It helps you move from a broad question to a defensible, citation-backed answer.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Parallel source search: Query web, academic, patent, and knowledge-base sources together for broader coverage.
  • Evidence synthesis: Compare findings, rank relevance and authority, and reconcile conflicting information.
  • Research outputs: Produce executive summaries, competitive analyses, literature reviews, and intelligence briefs with confidence scoring.
  • Use case: Ask it to investigate a market, technology, or scientific topic and return a structured report with citations and explicit knowledge gaps.

Quick Start

Ask the deep-research skill to investigate your topic, compare at least three credible sources, and return a cited summary with confidence levels and gaps.

Frequently Asked Questions about deep-research

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I conduct a literature review with citations and evidence synthesis?

To conduct a literature review with citations, query multiple academic and web sources in parallel, apply relevance ranking to rank authority, map citations, and synthesize findings into a structured report with confidence scoring and explicit knowledge gaps.

What is the best way to do competitive intelligence research across multiple sources?

The best way to do competitive intelligence research is to run parallel searches across web, academic, patent, and internal knowledge bases, reconcile conflicting information, and generate an intelligence brief with confidence scores and explicit knowledge gaps.

Can I do patent landscape analysis and compare findings from different sources?

Yes, patent analysis can compare findings by querying patent databases alongside web and academic sources in parallel, ranking relevance and authority, mapping citations, reconciling conflicting information, and generating an output with confidence scores and knowledge-gap reports.

How does confidence scoring work in multi-source research synthesis?

Confidence scoring in multi-source research synthesis evaluates source authority and relevance, ranks findings, and reconciles conflicting information to produce a defensible, citation-backed answer while explicitly reporting knowledge gaps.

Does research synthesis require comparing at least three credible sources?

Comparing at least three credible sources is recommended for research synthesis to ensure broader coverage, reconcile conflicting information, and generate a defensible summary with accurate confidence scoring and identified coverage gaps.

When should I expect knowledge-gap reporting in an evidence-backed investigation?

Knowledge-gap reporting occurs during research synthesis when parallel search across web, academic, patent, and internal sources reveals missing evidence or coverage limitations, explicitly flagging these gaps in the final structured report alongside confidence scores.