deep-research

Multi-phase research organizes iterative investigations into a disciplined 7-phase workflow. This methodology enforces structured briefs, gap tracking, and adversarial review to manage conflicting sources and produce defensible conclusions.

Red teaming in cross-domain research is an adversarial review phase that challenges findings to manage uncertainty and bias. It is needed when addressing high-stakes, complex questions with ambiguous evidence and competing sources.

Gap analysis is conducted in Phase 3 of the research workflow to identify missing evidence and unresolved sub-questions. It is followed by targeted research and refinement to fill those gaps and improve overall coverage.

Improving accuracy and coverage in high-stakes research requires a structured methodology with multi-source synthesis and explicit quality scoring. A 7-phase workflow with convergence scoring and red teaming ensures thorough exploration and robust conclusions.

Yes, a structured research brief is required before starting the workflow. The brief must detail the core question, sub-questions, key search terms, expected sections, and completion criteria to initiate Phase 1.

Iterative research workflows are not suitable for single-pass investigations or simple questions without conflicting sources. The structured 7-phase methodology is designed for high-stakes, cross-domain questions requiring depth-oriented analysis.