deep-research

Conduct multi-source research with parallel subagents and adversarial validation.

21|2|Updated Mar 12, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/kirillgreen/skills --skill deep-research-kirillgreen
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: deep-research
Source: https://github.com/kirillgreen/skills/tree/main/deep-research
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/kirillgreen/skills --skill deep-research-kirillgreen

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This skill solves the problem of inconsistent, shallow AI research by enforcing a structured, multi-step process that ensures every factual claim is verified, cited, and cross-referenced.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Multi-Agent Research: Uses parallel subagents to gather information from 10-20+ sources, ensuring breadth and depth.
  • Adversarial Review: Employs a contrarian agent to challenge conclusions, identify blind spots, and ensure findings survive expert scrutiny.
  • Credibility Filtering: Automatically grades sources on authority and independence to prevent marketing fluff or biased content from being presented as fact.
  • Use Case: Use this when you need to perform a high-stakes competitive analysis, evaluate a new technology, or investigate a complex regulatory landscape where accuracy and source diversity are critical.

Quick Start

Invoke the deep-research skill by typing /deep-research followed by your research topic to begin a thorough investigation.

Frequently Asked Questions about deep-research

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I conduct multi-source research with adversarial validation for complex topics?

Multi-source research with adversarial validation uses parallel subagents to gather information from 10-20+ sources, then employs a contrarian agent to challenge conclusions and identify blind spots. This ensures findings survive expert scrutiny.

What is the best way to verify source credibility and prevent biased content in AI research?

Source credibility assessment grades sources on authority and independence to prevent marketing fluff or biased content from being presented as fact. This filtering is applied automatically during the evidence-gathering phase.

Can I use automated research for high-stakes competitive analysis and regulatory investigation?

Automated research suits high-stakes competitive analysis, new technology evaluation, and complex regulatory investigation. It enforces a structured, multi-step process ensuring every factual claim is verified, cited, and cross-referenced.

How do I get inline citations and independent evidence chains for decision-making?

Inline citations and independent evidence chains are generated by cross-referencing multiple parallel sources during the research process. This satisfies accuracy requirements for high-stakes decision-making scenarios.

Why does AI research return shallow or inconsistent results without structured verification?

AI research returns shallow results without a structured process because it lacks adversarial review and source credibility filtering. Enforcing multi-step verification with a contrarian agent ensures every factual claim is cross-referenced.

When should I not use multi-agent research for my investigation?

Multi-agent research is not suited for simple, single-answer queries or situations where speed is prioritized over rigorous source verification and adversarial validation. It is designed for complex, high-stakes investigations requiring depth.