deep-research

Aggregate cross-verified evidence from multiple deep research engines into cited Markdown reports.

28|Updated Jan 3, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/ma08/botfiles --skill deep-research-ma08
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: deep-research
Source: https://github.com/ma08/botfiles/tree/main/codex/skills/deep-research
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/ma08/botfiles --skill deep-research-ma08

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill requires exa-py, python-dotenv, requests, and includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

High-stakes research questions require cross-checking evidence across multiple independent sources to avoid biased or incomplete conclusions, but manually coordinating multiple research tools and reconciling conflicting findings is time-consuming and error-prone. This Skill automates the entire end-to-end deep research workflow, from gathering evidence to synthesizing a reliable, cited report.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Parallel multi-engine research: Simultaneously query OpenAI, Gemini, and Exa deep research models to gather diverse, cross-verified evidence.
  • Structured citation-backed reporting: Automatically synthesize findings into a standardized, easy-to-scan Markdown report with explicit source citations and confidence levels.
  • Use cases: Ideal for due diligence, investment research, market and competitor analysis, technical investigations, policy analysis, and any high-stakes decision where source cross-checking improves conclusion reliability.

Quick Start

Use the deep-research skill to investigate the regulatory risks of launching a generative AI product in the EU and deliver a comprehensive citation-backed Markdown report.

Frequently Asked Questions about deep-research

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate cross-verified market analysis with citation-backed reports?

To automate market analysis with citation-backed reports, you can use a multi-engine research workflow that queries OpenAI, Gemini, and Exa simultaneously, reconciles conflicting claims, and synthesizes findings into a structured Markdown report with explicit source citations and confidence levels.

What is the best way to conduct due diligence research across multiple independent sources?

The best way to conduct due diligence research across multiple sources is to run parallel queries against independent deep research engines, apply source quality triage to the evidence, and let an automated workflow resolve overlapping claims to produce decision-grade outputs for high-stakes questions.

Can I use Exa and Gemini for deep research synthesis in a single workflow?

Yes, you can use Exa and Gemini for deep research synthesis within a single parallel multi-engine execution workflow, aggregating cross-verified evidence alongside OpenAI to generate a reliable, standardized Markdown report with consistent citations.

How does source conflict resolution work when gathering evidence from multiple research engines?

Source conflict resolution works by applying source quality triage to evidence gathered from parallel multi-engine research, filtering overlapping claims from independent engines to improve conclusion confidence and ensure only corroborated data informs the final synthesis.

Do I need the Exa Python client to generate investment research reports?

Yes, you need the Exa Python client installed to participate in the parallel multi-engine research execution, which is required to gather the cross-verified evidence used to synthesize the investment research Markdown reports.

What are the limitations of using automated research synthesis for technical investigations?

Automated research synthesis for technical investigations is limited by the quality of evidence returned by the underlying research engines, requiring source quality triage and conflict resolution to prevent biased or incomplete conclusions from affecting the decision-grade output.