deep-research

Multi-source research with source credibility scoring aggregates 25+ sources across focus areas using parallel subagents, triangulates findings, and produces a prose-first report with inline citations to support decisions.

Coordinating scope definition and gap analysis requires a methodical phased workflow covering scope, planning, discovery, triangulation, gap analysis, and reporting to ensure research completeness and balanced multi-angle results.

You can adjust multi-source research depth by selecting Quick, Standard, or Deep modes, which scales the parallel source discovery and aggregation to match the complexity of your topic and desired analytical thoroughness.

Source credibility scoring in multi-source research audits provenance by evaluating source quality ratings, enabling gap analysis and triangulation to ensure your final report contains well-supported, auditable insights.

Automated subagent research aggregation may document uncertainties and gaps in its final report, meaning complex topics still require reviewing the inline citations and source quality ratings to verify conclusions.

You need a structured research report with inline citations when equipping decisions for complex topics, such as evaluating a new technology, to provide a balanced, multi-angle analysis backed by 25+ auditable sources.