deep-research

Systematic investigation maps technical topics across independent dimensions like mechanisms and constraints, coordinates parallel evidence gathering, and produces structured reports with deduplication and source-quality assessment. It replaces ad hoc research with bounded multi-agent execution tracking coverage and uncertainty.

Source verification in evidence synthesis applies citation spot-checks, evaluates evidence quality, and explicitly resolves contradictions across findings. The process generates a claim register with corroboration levels to ensure conclusions are backed by validated sources rather than unsupported assertions.

Parallel evidence gathering coordinates multiple research agents across prioritized directions with controlled depth. It enforces bounded budgets, uses watchdogs for deduplication, and structures findings to ensure multi-dimensional exploration covers WHO, WHAT, HOW, WHERE, WHEN, WHY, and LIMITS without redundancy.

Yes, comparative analysis of competing approaches fits this systematic investigation framework. It maps technical mechanisms, production constraints, maturity levels, and failure modes side-by-side, applying coverage analysis to ensure all relevant cross-cutting concerns and prior failures are evaluated with sourced evidence.

Reporting unexplored areas requires explicit coverage assessments and honest documentation of known gaps within the research output. The synthesis process tracks stale-source warnings and unexplored dimensions, ensuring the final report transparently communicates uncertainty and boundaries of the investigation.

Coverage analysis is needed for open-ended research when exploring complex topics across multiple dimensions to prevent shallow conclusions. It tracks whether applicable WHO, WHAT, HOW, WHERE, WHEN, WHY, and LIMITS factors are sufficiently investigated, ensuring comprehensive exploration before final evidence synthesis.