deep-research

To conduct a literature review with citations, decompose your broad topic into focused subareas, run parallel web searches, evaluate source credibility, cross-reference claims, and synthesize findings into a structured report with explicit source URLs.

The best way to verify contested claims is to fetch full articles from multiple sources, assess their authority and bias, cross-reference the claims against each other, and document any limitations in a structured synthesis report.

You synthesize fragmented market analysis data by launching concurrent web searches across diverse sources, evaluating the accuracy and currency of each, cross-referencing the data, and formatting the results into a cited report.

Yes, you can perform a comprehensive technology analysis by decomposing the topic into five focused areas, running parallel subagents to fetch articles, and automatically evaluating source authority and bias.

Limitations of automated source evaluation include potential gaps in comprehensive coverage and the necessity to document limitations explicitly, as cross-referencing claims relies on available web sources and their stated accuracy.

You need to decompose a research question into focused subareas when facing complex topics requiring deep dives, ensuring comprehensive coverage by running parallel web searches and cross-referencing multiple sources.