deep-research

To generate a citation-rich research report, the Skill identifies and verifies information from multiple credible web sources, synthesizes the findings, and outputs a formatted Markdown document with inline URLs and access dates. It tags confidence levels for every claim.

The best way to synthesize conflicting evidence is to use a multi-axis research framework that explicitly surfaces conflicting data across sources. This Skill aggregates multiple credible perspectives and includes explicit conflict notes within the final Markdown report.

Yes, you can scope web research using a type-based framework that covers market, domain, technical, competitive, product, academic, financial, legal, trend, and community inquiries. This ensures thorough cross-source validation tailored to your specific topic.

Cross-source validation during multi-source research identifies unresolved information gaps and notes them explicitly. The Skill assesses source credibility, tags confidence levels for each claim, and documents any missing evidence in the final synthesized report.

Yes, research synthesis output includes explicit confidence tagging for every claim. Alongside inline citations and access dates, the formatted Markdown report documents confidence levels to help you evaluate the reliability of the aggregated information.

Limitations of automated web search for citation-backed research include potential unresolved information gaps and reliance on source availability. While the Skill surfaces conflicting evidence and tags confidence, it cannot definitively resolve missing data beyond documenting the gaps.