deep-research-pro

Source-verified decision briefs cross-check policy, market, technical, and literature evidence rather than returning plain web search answers. They grade sources, extract attachment PDF text, and structure consensus, counterarguments, and decision points for governance.

Cross-checking PDF evidence improves policy decision research by extracting and validating key document bodies and attachment PDFs. It goes beyond reading HTML alone, using text extraction fallback scripts to secure primary evidence and record citation quality with limitations.

You can validate Korean law sources for governance research by applying korean-law tools alongside web_search and web_fetch. This cross-checks official statutes and guidelines against public reports to build a reliable decision brief.

The best way to identify counterarguments in a policy brief is to systematically document the strongest opposing evidence and failure conditions alongside consensus points. This records why a conclusion might be wrong and what triggers failure.

This deep research approach works with PDF attachments from public reports by utilizing pdfplumber and pypdf dependencies. It applies fallback scripts for downloading sources and extracting PDF text when standard HTML reading is insufficient.

You need source grading instead of plain web search for institutional research when evaluating complex policy, market, or technical issues requiring official statutes, guidelines, and statistics. It ensures evidence is cross-verified and citation quality is recorded for decision-making.