deep-research

To structure multi-day technical research into a stakeholder report, define research questions, gather sources, evaluate evidence, and synthesize findings using templates like research reports and comparison matrices.

The best way to conduct competitive analysis is using a repeatable framework that coordinates evidence gathering and comparison matrices, delivering structured recommendations and decision rationale tailored for engineering and product teams.

Evidence evaluation during architecture exploration works by systematically gathering sources, assessing their validity, and synthesizing the data into comparison matrices to drive focused investigations and platform evaluations.

Yes, you can maintain context and continuity across multi-day research sessions using ohno-based workflows, which preserve traceability and ensure coordinated long-form investigations remain aligned with the original research questions.

No, this structured research approach does not require specific platform dependencies, allowing you to apply the framework to platform evaluations and decision papers across various product, engineering, and research environments.

You should use a comparison matrix for technology research when you need to evaluate multiple platforms or architectures, synthesizing gathered evidence into a structured format to present clear decision rationale to stakeholders.