deep-research

Translate a user topic into a structured, cited Markdown research report.

Updated Jun 14, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/swllljjz/deep-research-codex-skill --skill deep-research-swllljjz
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: deep-research
Source: https://github.com/swllljjz/deep-research-codex-skill/tree/main
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/swllljjz/deep-research-codex-skill --skill deep-research-swllljjz

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) and assets (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This skill helps generate sourced, structured Markdown research reports with embedded verification, style guidance, and traceable citations.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structured outline planning and topic decomposition for complex research tasks.
  • Evidence-backed data collection and data-pool generation with transparent sourcing.
  • Automated chapter drafting with citations, counterpoints, and error-checking.
  • Quality assurance integration (qa, style-lint, citation-lint) to ensure report rigor.

Quick Start

Ask for a deep research report on a topic and let the skill generate a fully cited Markdown document.

Frequently Asked Questions about deep-research

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I generate a cited Markdown research report with verifiable sources?

Generating a cited Markdown research report requires providing a topic, which the skill decomposes into a structured outline, drafts with evidence-backed data-pool sourcing, and formats with traceable citations. It outputs a fact-checked Markdown document.

What is the best way to ensure my industry analysis passes automated QA and style-lint checks?

To ensure your industry analysis passes automated QA and style-lint checks, this skill integrates quality assurance directly into the drafting process. It applies citation formatting, style guidelines, and error-checking to produce a rigorous Markdown report.

Can I use this for deep research tasks that require counterpoints and fact-checking?

You can use this for deep research tasks requiring counterpoints and fact-checking because it applies automated chapter drafting with error-checking and counterpoint integration. It translates complex topics into structured, evidence-backed Markdown reports.

Does this approach support evidence-backed data collection with transparent sourcing?

This approach supports evidence-backed data collection with transparent sourcing by generating a data-pool during the research phase. It structures your topic, collects verifiable data, and outputs a cited Markdown report designed to pass citation-lint checks.

What are the limitations of using automated QA for structured research reports?

A limitation of using automated QA for structured research reports is that it relies on the underlying data-pool quality and style-lint configurations. While it ensures citation formatting and structural rigor, it cannot verify external source truthfulness beyond the provided evidence.