deep-research

Coordinate web, coder, and cloud-model insights into a validated multi-source research report.

2.6k|696|Updated Mar 12, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/zts212653/clowder-ai --skill deep-research-zts212653
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: deep-research
Source: https://github.com/zts212653/clowder-ai/tree/main/cat-cafe-skills/deep-research
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/zts212653/clowder-ai --skill deep-research-zts212653

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

多源深度调研管道(Web Deep Research + Coder 合成 + 云端模型咨询)。 Use when: 技术问题需要多源调查、设计决策需要证据、铲屎官说"调研"/"research"、需要咨询云端模型。 Not for: 简单搜索(直接用 WebSearch)、已有结论的确认。 Output: 调研报告 + 证据合成 或 咨询文档(含回填区)。

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Mode A: 多源调研:Web 猫(网络搜索)+ Coder 猫(代码判断)+ GPT-5.2 Pro(审阅)= 三角验证
  • Mode B: 云端模型咨询:本地猫总结背景 → 铲屎官发给云端模型 → 回填结果 → 本地猫综合
  • Step 1 — 写 Prompt 并落盘 模板写在 docs/prompts/YYYY-MM-DD-{topic}-research-prompt.md;写完再发,不要边写边发。
  • Step 2 — 三路并行 Web 调研 同一个 prompt → Claude.ai Deep Research、Gemini Deep Research、ChatGPT Deep Research。
  • Step 3 — GPT-5.2 Pro 审阅 输入三份报告 → 找逻辑漏洞、弱证据、三方分歧,结果存:gpt-pro-review.md
  • Step 4 — Coder 猫综合 + 决策 读全部四份文档 → 对照实际 codebase 验证 → 标注"直接可用/需验证/项目特殊约束" 存:synthesis.md → ADR
  • 参考资料与工作流 Prompts 模板、三方报告导出、浏览器自动化等参照 docs、refs 目录。

Quick Start

Create the initial prompt under docs/prompts/YYYY-MM-DD-{topic}-research-prompt.md and follow the four-step workflow to conduct multi-source research and synthesize findings.

Frequently Asked Questions about deep-research

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I coordinate multi-source research for technical design decisions?

Multi-source research coordinates Web search, code analysis, and cloud model consultation to produce a validated research report with synthesized evidence and an architecture decision record.

What is the best way to validate external research against my codebase?

Validating external research against a codebase involves cross-referencing multiple web research reports with actual code constraints, categorizing findings as directly usable, needing verification, or project-specific exceptions.

How do I synthesize findings from multiple deep research tools?

Synthesizing findings from multiple deep research tools requires parallel execution of identical prompts, followed by expert review to identify logical flaws, weak evidence, and disagreements before generating a final synthesis document.

When do I need multi-source synthesis instead of a simple web search?

Multi-source synthesis is needed when technical questions require diverse evidence, design decisions need validation, or external cloud model consultation is necessary, rather than for simple searches or confirming existing conclusions.

Can I consult cloud models and integrate their responses into local research?

Consulting cloud models involves summarizing the local background, sending it to the cloud model, backfilling the returned results, and finally synthesizing the combined insights into a comprehensive research document.

What are the limitations of using parallel deep research workflows?

Limitations include dependency on multiple external deep research services, manual export of third-party reports, and the necessity of codebase validation to fill implementation gaps rather than trusting external outputs directly.