deep-review

Multi-domain code review of large diffs runs independent competency checks for security, performance, architecture, and concurrency in parallel. It synthesizes isolated findings into a unified triage report to guide actionable remediation.

Parallel competency-based code review assigns isolated expert reviewers to specific domains like database, error-handling, and testing simultaneously. This scales review throughput and improves findings quality for complex changes by maintaining focused context per domain.

Use parallel code review for large diffs of 200+ lines or multi-domain changes requiring deep structured analysis. It complements single-pass fast reviews by enforcing independent checklists and a centralized FIX/DEFER/ACCEPT triage for complex modifications.

Triage code review findings across multiple domains by aggregating isolated expert evaluations into a centralized synthesis report. The structured workflow applies a unified FIX/DEFER/ACCEPT classification to guide actionable remediation across all competencies.

Yes, you can run isolated security and concurrency checks on complex changes. The workflow coordinates independent reviewers per competency, ensuring separate expert evaluations for database, frontend, and error-handling domains without context interference.

Parallel competency reviews are limited by overhead for small diffs. The structured workflow with independent checklists and unified triage is designed for large or complex multi-domain changes, making it less suitable for quick single-pass code reviews.