deep-review

Coordinate six parallel review agents to identify and prioritize code-quality issues.

Updated Aug 23, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/lucas-barake/dotai --skill deep-review-lucas-barake
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: deep-review
Source: https://github.com/lucas-barake/dotai/tree/main/canonical/skills/deep-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/lucas-barake/dotai --skill deep-review-lucas-barake

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Deep code review on complex changes is automated, coordinating six specialized agents to identify issues across multiple dimensions and consolidate findings into actionable fixes.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Coordinated multi-agent review: six focused roles (logic, security, data integrity, behavioral/contracts, concurrency, and project rules) examine diffs in parallel.
  • Deduplication & prioritization: merges overlapping findings and ranks them by impact.
  • Evidence-backed reporting: validates findings against the diff and outputs confidence-scored recommendations.

Quick Start

Provide a comprehensive, deduplicated findings report for the latest diff.

Frequently Asked Questions about deep-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate deep code review for complex pull requests?

Automated static analysis for code review is achieved by coordinating six parallel agents that examine logic, security, data integrity, and concurrency. The system merges overlapping findings, ranks them by impact, and outputs actionable fixes with confidence scoring.

How does parallel review work for identifying code-quality issues?

Parallel static analysis works by deploying six specialized agents to examine diffs simultaneously across logic, security, behavioral contracts, and project rules. It enforces predefined rules, validates evidence against changed files, and deduplicates findings to prioritize code-quality issues.

Can I use automated code review to check concurrency and data integrity in my codebase?

Automated static analysis can check concurrency and data integrity in your codebase through dedicated parallel agents. These agents examine diffs to identify issues across multiple dimensions, validating evidence against changed files to ensure behavioral contracts are maintained.

What's the best way to deduplicate findings from static analysis on a branch diff?

The best way to deduplicate findings from static analysis on a branch diff is using a coordinated multi-agent system. It merges overlapping findings from six specialized review roles, validates evidence against the diff, and ranks consolidated issues by impact.

Does automated code review work without predefined project rules?

Automated static analysis works with predefined project rules by integrating a dedicated agent for project-rule enforcement. While it can identify standard logic and security issues, the system specifically applies predefined review rules to ensure codebase compliance.

Why does my automated code review output confidence-scored recommendations?

Automated static analysis outputs confidence-scored recommendations to validate evidence against changed files and ensure accuracy. This scoring system prioritizes code-quality issues by impact, providing actionable fixes backed by verified evidence from the diff analysis.