deep-web-research

Conduct multi-source web research and output structured reports with confidence labels.

Updated Apr 6, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/alexwox/genesis-template --skill deep-web-research
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: deep-web-research
Source: https://github.com/alexwox/genesis-template/tree/main/.cursor/skills/deep-web-research
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/alexwox/genesis-template --skill deep-web-research

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill eliminates one-off, low-confidence web searches and delivers rigorous, multi-source analysis suitable for high-stakes decisions by enforcing triangulation, source-quality scoring, contradiction checks, and explicit confidence labels.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Hypothesis-driven framing: convert a request into a primary question, 3–7 subquestions, and falsifiable hypotheses to guide search scope.
  • Source-tiered evidence collection: prioritize Tier 1/2 sources, log URL, date, tier, and evidence strength, and require multiple strong citations for major claims.
  • Contradiction testing and synthesis: surface disagreements, test counterevidence, and produce evidence-backed conclusions with confidence scores and recommendations.
  • Parallel, structured workstreams: run up to four concurrent lanes for market size, customer signals, competition, and risks then centralize synthesis into a single decision-grade output.
  • Use case example: perform market entry due diligence, vendor landscape comparisons, or technology risk assessments that directly inform go/no-go decisions.

Quick Start

Conduct deep research on the competitive landscape for entering the EV charging market over the next 12 months and deliver a full_report with sources, confidence scores, contradictions, and recommendations.

Frequently Asked Questions about deep-web-research

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I conduct decision-grade web research for high-stakes vendor comparisons?

Decision-grade web research prioritizes Tier 1/2 sources to produce evidence-backed conclusions. It enforces multi-source triangulation, contradiction checks, and confidence labels to directly inform go/no-go vendor comparisons.

What is source triangulation and how does it improve competitive intelligence?

Source triangulation cross-validates claims across multiple independent sources to improve competitive intelligence. It prioritizes Tier 1/2 credibility, logs URLs and dates, and requires multiple strong citations to prevent relying on low-confidence data.

How do I run market sizing and due diligence research in parallel workstreams?

Run market sizing and due diligence in up to four concurrent lanes covering market size, customer signals, competition, and risks. These parallel workstreams centralize synthesis into a single structured report with confidence scores.

Can I use hypothesis-driven search for regulatory impact assessments and technology risk evaluations?

Hypothesis-driven search converts requests into primary questions, subquestions, and falsifiable hypotheses. It applies structured search scopes to assess regulatory impacts and evaluate technology risks across global or region-specific contexts.

What is the best way to evaluate source credibility for evidence synthesis?

Evaluate source credibility for evidence synthesis by tiering sources based on authority and evidence strength. Log URLs, dates, and tiers to ensure major claims require multiple strong citations from high-credibility sources.

Why does deep web research require explicit confidence labels in the final report?

Deep web research requires explicit confidence labels to transparently communicate evidence strength for high-stakes decisions. Labels surface disagreements, test counterevidence, and produce evidence-backed conclusions with actionable recommendations.