design-an-interface

To compare different API design options before implementation, you can generate multiple radically different interface designs with distinct constraints, then evaluate them on simplicity, depth, efficiency, and correctness to choose the most robust shape.

The design it twice approach for library and module architecture involves generating multiple diverse interface shapes with different constraints, analyzing their trade-offs, and synthesizing a recommendation to prevent premature commitment to a single design.

You can generate alternative interface signatures and usage examples by spawning parallel sub-agents with distinct constraints, which produce diverse interface shapes, hidden internals, and trade-off analyses for your abstraction scenarios.

Yes, this method works for evaluating module and API correctness without full implementation by comparing generated interface designs on simplicity, depth, efficiency, and correctness, then synthesizing a final recommended design.

The best way to eliminate decision paralysis when choosing an API shape is to force diverse trade-offs by generating multiple radically different interface designs, comparing them structurally, and synthesizing a clear recommendation for the primary use case.