Generate and compare multiple interface designs with trade-off analysis.
npx skills add https://github.com/sQVe/cape --skill design-an-interface-sqve
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: design-an-interface Source: https://github.com/sQVe/cape/tree/main/skills/design-an-interface Command: npx skills add https://github.com/sQVe/cape --skill design-an-interface-sqve
Generate and compare multiple interface designs under conflicting constraints to determine the strongest API surface, module boundary, or type contract.
Provide three competing interface designs for a new API surface and a recommended one after evaluation.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
To design a robust API interface under conflicting constraints, evaluate multiple competing designs by comparing their concrete signatures, usage snippets, and trade-offs across simplicity, flexibility, and implementation cost to determine the strongest contract.
The best way to compare competing API designs for a module boundary is to generate 3-4 distinct options with language-specific signatures and perform a structured comparison evaluating common-case ergonomics, depth, and implementation cost before selecting a final recommendation.
Evaluating trade-offs when designing type contracts involves assessing each competing design across simplicity, depth, flexibility, and implementation cost, then providing a final rationale that notes the strengths of the chosen interface and ideas reused from rejected designs.
Yes, you can generate concrete language-specific usage snippets for different API surface designs by crafting at least 3 distinct interface options, allowing you to directly compare their ergonomics and trade-offs before finalizing the module boundary.
Creating multiple competing designs before finalizing an interface contract forces you to evaluate conflicting constraints directly, ensuring the final API surface balances simplicity and flexibility while documenting the exact trade-offs that led to the recommendation.
You should not use a single design approach for a new API surface when conflicting constraints exist, because evaluating 3-4 distinct designs with concrete signatures is required to balance ergonomics, depth, and implementation cost effectively.
proyecto26Structure ambiguous system design prompts into functional requirements, non-functional constraints, and out-of-scope boundaries.
dirnbauerFetch current library documentation and API references via the Context7 REST API.
jayteealaoReview software architecture boundaries, performance, and API contracts using standardized checklists.
maxenergyGenerate multiple interface designs for a module using parallel sub-agents.
