design-coherence-check

Audit research designs for ontology, epistemology, methodology, and method consistency.

265|23|Updated Feb 7, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/yipng05-max/-skills --skill design-coherence-check-yipng05-max
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: design-coherence-check
Source: https://github.com/yipng05-max/-skills/tree/main/design-coherence-check
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/yipng05-max/-skills --skill design-coherence-check-yipng05-max

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

研究者在写研究设计时,常会出现本体论-认识论-方法论-具体方法之间不一致,导致“方法论说法不被方法支撑”“效度/可信度语言混用”“审稿人质疑你方法选得不对”等问题,这个 Skill 帮你把这些深层矛盾系统性地找出来。

Core Features & Use Cases

  • 四层架构还原:把研究设计拆解为本体论、认识论、方法论、具体方法,并明确哪些是推断、哪些是不清晰。
  • 逐级一致性检查:重点检查三个“接缝”(本体论→认识论、认识论→方法论、方法论→具体方法),给出一致/有张力/根本矛盾的评估。
  • 专项一致性核验:包括效度语言体系一致性、理论框架-方法论一致性、研究问题-方法匹配。
  • 输出修改清单:对每个可能的问题给出“问题描述—危害说明—修改选项(至少两个方向)—推荐方向”。

适用场景示例:你要提交论文/开题报告/审稿复审时,怀疑方法论写得跟方法或研究问题不完全对齐,或者不确定应使用哪一套可信度/效度语言。

Quick Start

用你的研究问题和你已写好的方法章节内容触发该 Skill,并让它自动完成四层还原、逐级一致性检查与专项核验。

Frequently Asked Questions about design-coherence-check

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I check if my research methodology aligns with my epistemology?

To check research methodology alignment, audit the coherence across your ontology, epistemology, methodology, and methods to detect mismatches. This process evaluates three junctions for consistency and identifies validity language mixing or theory-method gaps before submission.

What is research design coherence and why do reviewers question it?

Research design coherence is the logical consistency between your ontological claims, epistemological stance, methodology, and concrete methods. Reviewers question it when methods fail to support methodological claims or when validity terminology is mixed inappropriately across paradigms.

How to fix mixed validity language in a qualitative research design?

Fix mixed validity language by running a targeted check on your credibility terminology consistency against your epistemological framework. The audit identifies misapplied terms and provides a prioritized issue list with at least two modification options per problem.

Can I use this coherence check for a dissertation proposal?

Yes, you can use a coherence check for dissertation, journal, or proposal workflows. Provide your research problem and written methods section to extract the four design levels and evaluate whether your methods match your stated research questions.

What is the best way to align research questions with qualitative methods?

The best way to align research questions with qualitative methods is performing a targeted consistency check on problem-method matching. This extracts your design's four levels and produces modification options to resolve tensions between your research questions and chosen methods.